logitech g502 lightspeed vs razer viper ultimate

Why are we so obsessed with graphics that we pay huge amounts of money for pretty, but soulless games and remakes of the same game that we already own? Some people really seem to make it a crusade for some reason.

There's way too much fighting in the online community over which graphical feature is important, and what one should or shouldn't use.A lot of (even not so old) games are being remade with slightly upgraded graphics, and they seem to be popular for some reason.A lot of (especially AAA) games are being marketed by their graphics these days, like there's not a lot behind it (and a lot of times there really isn't).Now that the (to me) obvious is out of the way, let me continue with some observations. Thirdly, this is not an 'RT is sooo awesome, woaoah!' thread. Secondly, this is not an FSR vs DLSS thread. When that's the market, why wouldn't you aim to constantly raise the baseline of everything (thereby increasing your profits)?įirstly, this is not an AMD vs Nvidia thread. Graphic upgrades are just a facelift, but the trick is that these companies can sell us a new card every 3-5 years by making things more intensive.and recently we've demonstrated that poor optimization can even be 'mitigated' by throwing more hardware at things. In my lifetime I've seen fads come and go.and return years later with a facelift. I think that the corporate side of this exists because there is nothing new under the sun. I would like to see it remastered, because it's a nostalgia hit that would be nice to not be a chunky pixel mess. I instead enjoyed spite the miserable fog and unbalanced mess of a final level. I'm tired of the latest Battlefield.because its mechanics are already played out, despite being quite graphically pleasing. Let me be clear then, I believe that the driver for improved visuals is secondary to the driver for nostalgic core components. As such, when I heard about the remaster I was pumped because the fixes and QOL improvements from Bioshock could be put into the remake.and it was going to be visually upgraded. Thing is, because I did it out of order I saw the refinement before the origin. It was a good game.but left a lot to be desired when you started comparing it backward to Bioshock. I played the original system shock 2 on a Core2 Quad. The best they had was a vega 64 that couldn't even at the time compete with the previous generation to Turing.Īfter reading through some of this.and seeing the inevitable diversion to tech rather than the theory.I'll offer my two cents. I mean AMd deserves some credit also look how far behind they were 5 years ago. I think a lot of people are so mad at nvidia over pricing and proprietary features on their hardwar that it blinds them to how much progress has been made. The best they had was a vega 64 that couldn't even at the time compete with the previous generation to Turing.ĭon't get me wrong though a lot of games are like RE4 when it comes to RT where you go why is it even in the game hopefully in 10 years the baseline is CP2077 and both hardware vendors are really good at it and maybe Intel as well but I trust them about as far as I can spit to stay in the discrete gpu market. I mean Amd deserves some credit also look how far behind they were 5 years ago. I think a lot of people are so mad at nvidia over pricing and proprietary features on their hardware that it blinds them to how much progress has been made. One of my biggest issues with older rendering technology is screen space reflections it's absolutely awful in every game and breaks easily RT reflection when done right are a massive improvement over that and Ray reconstruction generally makes them even better that's really just one example and honestly the hardware isn't quite there yet but in 2018 after seeing RT in Battlefield 5 which was terrible and also had a massive performance hit on Turing if someone showed me a Pathtraced screen shot of CP2077 and said we would be able to do that on hardware in 5 years I wouldn't believe them. It weighs in at 114 g without the cable, has up to 16 g weights and is approximately 132 x 75 x 40 mm (LxWxH).Becuase it's sorta the start of them fixing the denoising issue with RT on current hardware and while it's not a fix all solution for a first version it's a very impressive technology what it fixes in general is much more noticeable than what it doesn't do well. This results in a tracking speed of 400 IPS, and a maximum acceleration of 40 G. This is combined with a 32-bit ARM Microprocessor. The G502 Lightspeed by Logitech uses an Optical sensor, specifically the Hero, providing a DPI/CPI range of 100 - 16,000 DPI. Up to 80 hours (constant motion at 1000Hz)īlack or White, PUBG: BATTLEGROUNDS Edition Up to 48 hours with lighting, up to 60 with out

Logitech g502 lightspeed vs razer viper ultimate